Savile, Silvio, Sandusky: The Abuse of Authority

From Italy, Britain and rural Pennsylvania, a triangle of the abuse of authority fills the news. The appalling allegations against the British celebrity (now deceased) Jimmy Savile now run into the hundreds. The leering Silvio Berlusconi was finally sentenced to a jail term that, regrettably, no one should expect him to serve. And it was reported that Penn State students are divided over the ethics of the Sandusky case.

By now we have to see this as systemic. From the Clinton-era scandals to the Catholic Church, and the priapic fantasist of the IMF Dominic Strauss-Kahn to this latest wave of abuse, it’s clear that there is a consistency.  In a perverse parody of the embodied claim to freedom represented by the Occupy movement, the neoliberal quest for dominance is being acted out on the bodies of those who everyone moves past and fails to see–the orphan, the sex worker, the disabled, the impoverished.

What is important to stress is that this has nothing to do with sex or desire. Dominance and submission as forms of pleasure depend, first, on the consistent possibility to end the play and, second, on the equal status of the participants. In the abuse of power, the abused have no such equality and are subject to verbal and media attacks if they speak up. This violence extends to journalists like Laurie Penny (@pennyred, a good friend of Occupy) or Suzanne Moore, whose thoughtful work on feminism and sexuality attracts amazingly vile comments: on the GuardianIndependent and New Statesman websites, note, not on some Tea Party discussion board.

In the university sector, an ethics class at Penn State is being taught around the Sandusky scandal. Depressingly enough, one student sums up the discussions on campus like this:

You either somehow support child abuse or you hate Penn State.

That’s reminiscent of the accusation of America-hating leveled against people bringing up the Abu Ghraib photographs, a discourse sufficiently successful that undergraduate freshmen at NYU this year did not recognize the photographs when shown them in class.

At Penn State, the discussions are lively around the case, pleasing the professor Jonathan Marks:

This was his role: to encourage, and promote, discussion. He never offers his opinion on the scandal, allowing the students to cultivate their own ideas.

Now, Marks is not quoted here and I suspect he might not put it quite like that. But the teaching strategy is familiar enough. I wouldn’t myself use it in this case because I don’t see an ethical dilemma here. It seems from the article that his intent was to give students ethical frameworks with which to analyze their existing tensions over Sandusky. Is that enough?

While these points may be salient, I have to recognize how abuse plays through academic life. In every department in which I have taught, male faculty members have approached me with comments about the attractiveness of some of the students. I’ve not joined the discussion or encouraged it but I have to realize that I did not forcefully condemn it. I eye-roll and change the subject. Again, to be crystal clear, I am certain that none of my colleagues engaged in abuse of the Sandusky kind.

As I write this, though, I now remember an incident long ago, in which the first discussion I had with a faculty member at an institution I had just joined was his request for me to sign a letter supporting him in a case of sexual harassment. He had tenure. I was a first-year assistant professor. I signed. I later met the victim and realized what a mistake I had made. Luckily, the university upheld her view and he was asked to leave.

What of Occupy? There were allegations of abuse, even rape, at the encampments. I never saw anything like that but I was not there overnight when the incidents were supposed to have happened. Do men claim too much authority, talk too much, always stress action over mutual aid? I wish I could say no.

This is an age of dominance without hegemony. Military power has failed to win the battle of hearts and minds in Afghanistan and Iraq. The wages of whiteness have been devalued. Certain men feel that their diminished authority must be acted out as dominance over the bodies of others. The impact of these rolling revelations is that such assertions of dominance cannot be limited to those negative spaces like the Army or the Church that radicals and liberals alike feel comfortable criticizing. It’s in media, in universities, in progressive politics and it’s not that we didn’t know but that we didn’t know it was still this bad. Or maybe that should be I didn’t know.

I just went for a walk. There was a fashionably dressed young man urinating against my building in full view of everyone at 10 o’clock at night.

2 thoughts on “Savile, Silvio, Sandusky: The Abuse of Authority

  1. I am obviously against rape sexual harrasment and abuses of power. I do get tired however of the narrative out there that all or most men are predators that rapists are lurking around every corner, and they are me simply by being male. Taken too far and it seems less a concern about justice than of a society that still can’t handle sex in a mature way. I don’t think men really protect other men when they engage in rape and actual sexual harrasment because there men and its some kinda secret guy code. Rapists get beat up in prison by murderers and career criminals, almost nobody thinks rape is ok except idiot “comedians” like Daniel Tosh. Commissioners of a billion dollar college football industry, might have a reason to sweep troubling allegations under the rug however. A church hierarchy might want to do the same thing, and some may even take advantage of the situation to get rid of priests they don’t like. When you have men who believe themselves to be privileged and entitled over others as an elite this abuse becomes common because they dehumanize their victims. It just seems like when the Sandusky Joe Paterno scandal broke we should have taken a long hard look at what an industry college sports has become, how corporate supposedly state run colleges are. How bad corporate culture is. How an obsession with wealth status and winning can blind people from feelings of empathy and erode their morals and values. But when I saw this story on MSNBC some woman reporter basically just said tsk tsk boys will be boys and some women mangers would’ve never let that happen. I’m sorry but anal rape of little boys is not considered harmless drunken antics by the vast majority of American men. Instead of talking about real structural issues the corporate media gave us some kind women are from Venus, men are from Mars crap to explain this, and as a progressive minded guy I’m supposed to agree and be like yeah guys do suck. Keep in mind there were female staff at the university who knew some or all of what was going on and stayed quiet and female students out there demonstrating for ol Joe.

  2. Pingback: The Continuing One Per Cent Hatred of Democracy | Occupy 2012